Marines in Iraq Speak
For Marines, a Frustrating Fight
Some in Iraq Question How and Why War Is Being Waged
When troops voice opinions that could get them disciplined and don’t give a damn, it has to be pretty bad. I don’t think Bush is going to win the military vote.
October 10th, 2004 at 5:53 am
I read somewhere (was it here?) that Dubya is losing the “latrine poll.” The troops can’t say what they think to reporters, but they can express themselves robustly on the walls of the johnz.
October 10th, 2004 at 6:24 am
I have lived through Watergate and several other “gates”. What this President has done to this country is far worse. The rest of the world is laughing at us. Why isn’t this President being investigated? The following article is just one of many I totally agree with that call for the President to be held accountable.
Is There Still Time to Impeach the President before Nov. 2?
By Jason Leopold John Dean, the former counsel to President Richard Nixon, made a case last year for impeaching President George W. Bush if the president intentionally misled Congress and the public into backing a war with Iraq.
“To put it bluntly, if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war based on bogus information, he is cooked,” Dean wrote in a June 6, 2003 column for findlaw.com. “Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be “a high crime” under the Constitution’s impeachment clause. It would also be a violation of federal criminal law, including the broad federal anti-conspiracy statute, which renders it a felony “to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose.”
On Wednesday, a 918-page report released by the Iraqi Survey Group, headed by former United Nations weapons inspector Charles Duelfer, said Iraq eliminated all of its illicit arms programs in the mid-1990s, shortly after the first Gulf War. In other words, Iraq wasn’t a threat. But in the months leading up to the war, Bush and several other senior members of his administration said the threat was real.
Some of Bush’s most frightening statements about Iraq’s non-existent weapons program:
* “We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons — the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.”
(Radio Address, October 5, 2002)
“The Iraqi regime . . . possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons.”
“We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, VX nerve gas.”
“We’ve also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We’re concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using these UAVS for missions targeting the United States.”
“The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group he calls his “nuclear mujahideen” - his nuclear holy warriors. Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.” (Cincinnati, Ohio Speech, October 7, 2002).
“Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.” (State of the Union Address, January 28, 2003).
Bush’s dire warning turned out to be misleading and, as we now know, factually wrong, or, even worse, lies. That’s grounds for impeachment.
“Presidential statements, particularly on matters of national security, are held to an expectation of the highest standard of truthfulness,” Dean wrote in a June 6 column. “A president cannot stretch, twist or distort facts and get away with it. President Lyndon Johnson’s distortions of the truth about Vietnam forced him to stand down from reelection. President Richard Nixon’s false statements about Watergate forced his resignation.”
Remember, this a government that impeached a president for accepting sexual favors in the oval office and lying about it. The punishment for taking a country to war on false pretenses should be worse.
************* (c) 2004 Jason Leopold
Home Page | Headlines | Previous Story | Next Story
Copyright (c) Scoop Media
Scoop For: - NZ Business News - NZ Science And Technology News - NZ Arts News - NZ Politics News - NZ Parliament News - NZ Education News - NZ Health News
Positive Energy For: - Positive Energy - NZ Positive Energy - New Zealand Energy Policy - NZ Power Policy
October 10th, 2004 at 7:17 am
Barbara,
Excellent catch of an article. Actially, the charge can be made that President Bush participated in a political schemed that was cooked up at a Bone and Skulls meeting.
If one puts together the dates and the Mid Congressional Elections as well as how Bush and other republican talking heads used 9/11 to promote the “Need” for president Bush to have full control of the Senate, House, and White House if he was going to keep America Safe. In simple terms one could almost charge the entire Republican Party Leadership with a plot to take control of this nations powers. Now, if anyone could prove cardinal knowledge of the scheme by someone is a horse I do believe this country does not want to ride.