The Gap
There is a gap between the thoughts of those in “the blogosphere” and the politicians in Washington. It seems that people who get their news and information from online sources like weblogs are much better informed, and consistently so. And this informedness appears to lead to common conclusions. It is surprising how consistent the thoughts of the bloggers are.
And it is surprising how so many Washington Democrats seem so ill-informed about so many of the issues, or so out of touch with things that every single Progressive blogger and blog-reader understands. How many of them understand that the Republican Social Security proposal phases out Social Security? But webloggers and their readers know this.
For example, we - bloggers and blog-readers - all see that the Social Security “crisis” is baloney. It’s just lies manufactured by the Republicans, designed to make the public think the program needs to be changed, so they can just slip in this privatization phase-out plan that enriches Wall Street brokers while forcing seniors into poverty. And we all see how the media is falling for the Republican line that there is this huge problem with Social Security that needs to be “fixed” and that investing in stocks is somehow a better investment than government bonds.
Another example — How many Democratic Senators say they won’t oppose Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General? But us bloggers and blog-readers ALL understand that a vote for Gonzales is a vote for torture.
Maybe the lack of solid Democratic opposition to Gonzales is because they are afraid that Rush Limbaugh is going to say bad things about you if they oppose him? Maybe they are worried that the media will portray you, maybe say you are “obstructionist?” Maybe they are afraid that they’ll be portrayed as “anti-Hispanic?” But bloggers and blog-readers understand that Rush Limbaugh IS going to say bad things about them. The Right-wing echo-chamber WILL portray them as obstructionist. They WILL portray them as anti-Hispanic. These things will happen no matter what they do, so we want them to grow spines and do the right thing.
Online Progressives understand, and Washington Democrats don’t seem to get, that the time of wishy-washy Democrats is over. If they are going to be wishy-washy or Republican Light, they might as well just BE a Republican. And if Democratic politicians wait to see how the polls go on the issue, then the only people working to MOVE the polls will be the Republicans! The Republicans are out there with their 24-7 Republican AM Radio network, and FOX, and the Republican think tanks and pundits and commentators, all saying “Do this, do this do this” while the Democrats are all waiting to see how the polls go before they say anything, so of course the polls are going to go the way the Republicans are pushing them!
The phrase “tax relief” is a good example of the gap between bloggers and their readers, and the Washington Democrats. How many Washington Democrats have you heard using the term “tax relief?” They don’t know better. They don’t k now that this is a Republican “frame.” I heard John Edwards using the words “tax relief” €“ I think it was during his debate with Vice President Cheney. Now, I know his wife reads blogs, so maybe she should have been debating instead of John. Because she gets her information online she would have seen this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this. or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this or this or the approx. 7500 other online references to this. Bloggers and their readers know better than to talk about “tax relief.”



January 5th, 2005 at 1:26 pm
At work this morning, we were talking about Social Security over coffee. I pointed out that it is not in trouble and there is no crisis. A long-time, good, respectable, extremely intelligent friend disagreed. My reply was a horrible screwup: “then…you’re misinformed.”
Never have I seen this individual get angry with me like that. He spluttered, said some words he usually doesn’t, and walked off (neither of us is normally confrontational and I RESPECT this person deeply.) We talked later. What pissed him off was my arrogance as perceived from his side of the conversation. As if I want to be right on everything.
From my side, it wasn’t arrogance; it was frustration. I’m a voracious reader. I DO know - with as much certainty as anyone can - a tremendous amount more than I did two years ago, but I’ve never claimed to know everything, or to be right on everything I beleive I know. As I pointed out to my friend, I reserve the greatest skepticism for myself: I want to BE right, not just THINK I’m right, which means constantly checking my perceptions against verifiable reality. Even so, the gap between what I see and what most around me see - grows ever wider by the day. How do you bridge that gap in daily life without angering friends, appearing arrogant, or otherwise messing up?
Sign me frustrated.
January 5th, 2005 at 1:47 pm
…people who get their news and information from online sources like weblogs are much better informed…
It’s easier to stay informed if you don’t have to work for a living.
January 5th, 2005 at 3:38 pm
Now that I’m home from work and have a bit of time to catch up, I have to say you’re right: it would be easier to keep up if I didn’t have to work. Well, no point wasting more time here; I’ve read the latest on this web log and I’m moving to another. So I can keep up. Because it matters.
January 5th, 2005 at 3:50 pm
people who get their news and information from online sources like weblogs are much better informed
That’s true on the left, in general.
Definitely NOT true of those whose primary sources of info are Instahack, Drudge, FreiRepublik, Newsmin, WorldNetDaily, Townhall, etc.
January 5th, 2005 at 7:17 pm
Nibor Dooh (that’s Robin Hood spelled backwards)and his merry band of neo-conmen steal from the poor to give to the rich. And that’s what the so-called “Rescue of Social Security” is all about.
Also, I wish the media would start calling Iraq by its real name, “The Tar Baby.”
January 5th, 2005 at 11:18 pm
“the media is falling for the Republican line that there is …this huge problem with Social Security that needs to be €œfixed€ and that investing in stocks is somehow a better investment than government bonds….
Sounds like religion to me… your soul needs to be “fixed” and we have a nifty solution that benefits out coffers…
January 6th, 2005 at 1:13 am
What We’re Reading
Digby on why the Republicans hate Social Security: …Their motive for destroying social security is that it puts the lie to their contention that government can’t be trusted to do any positive social good. They are wrong and social security…