Kinsey Film Obliterates Entire Era By Claiming It Had Sex
Who was the worst man of the 20th century?
Hitler, you say. Or perhaps Stalin or Pol Pot. Or maybe Mr. Rogers?
Nope, it was Alfred Kinsey.
Hey, we didn’t know this either until we came across this WorldNetDaily column by Dr. (Ph.D. 1980 in Communications, Case Western Reserve University) Judith Reisman.
And it seems that the Hollywood folks who made a movie about Kinsey are almost as bad as he was, as we learn from the title of Dr. Reisman’s piece: “Kinsey Film Lies, Defames World War II Americans.”
We will let Dr. Reisman tell you why Kinsey deserves the title of “century’s most evil” in a moment, but first, an important warning:
Editor’s note: Parents are advised this column contains information that may not be appropriate for children.
Okay, kids out of the room? Good.
Now we can study the opening paragraph, which indicates that Kinsey is responsible for possibly trillions of rapes and abortions:
In 1948, “illegitimacy,” abortion and rape rates were some hundreds of percentiles less than today, when even elementary school children are sexually “literate.”
Get that, the rates are HUNDREDS of 1/100ths more today that they used to be!!!
Exactly what is the rate rape now, and how does it compare to the rape rate of 1948?
Since we would need crime statistics from both eras, and would also have to factor in many variables (how crimes were recorded in the past compared to how they are recorded now; how many rapes go unreported; the differing perceptions of what constitutes rape , etc.) we certainly don’t know, and can’t find anybody else who does either. But presumably Dr. Reisman does, and has it measured in hundreds of percentiles.
However, she’s not telling us what it is, because she needs to use her word count to warn us about Kinsey.
Yet that year, an impotent, closeted bi-homosexual pedophilic psychopath “proved” to the world that American GI’s and Rosie the Riveters were wildly randy adventurers who were also so sexually witless that they often didn’t even know where children came from.
Yes, Kinsey is not only responsible for all those rapes and abortions, but also for libeling the Greatest Generation by saying that some of them were randy, and some of them were uneducated when it came to sex.
Oh, and it seems that Kinsey was also a bi-homosexual pedophiliac psychopath, which is apparently a medical diagnosis that doctors of communications are allowed to make.
It is shameful to see how the courageous men and women who gave their lives for our freedom in World War II continue to be defamed as sexually immature Neanderthals in the artsy film flop, “Kinsey,” written and directed by homosexual swami, Bill Condon.
Well, the ones who died in W.W.II fighting for our freedom presumably never read Kinsey’s work (and I doubt they caught the movie), so it’s probably not a big deal to them.
Kinsey’s “research” for “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” (1948) took place at the height of World War II. Condon, like Kinsey, obliterated the entire war era.
Kinsey obliterated an entire era! Stalin, who is blamed for the death of millions, was a piker in comparison. And apparently Condon should be prosecuted for mass murder too, since his movie also wiped out an era. (But since it was the same era already destroyed by Kinsey, it might be hard to get a conviction.)
Women were running the nation’s industries. Nearly every able-bodied father, husband and son €“ except Kinsey and his sexually willing boy toy team €“ was overseas fighting for our liberty.
Then who was having the sex that Kinsey was investigating?
Until Kinsey “enlightened” us, Americans called sex “the marital act” and thought you should see the person you did “it” with (that is, eye-to-eye, lip-to-lip, breast-to-chest, and all the rest).
Until Kinsey, the missionary position was all there was, and only married people did it. It was a golden age, and then Kinsey invented all those other positions, and look where we are now.
Fox-Coppola-Condon claimed that Kinsey’s books “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” (1948) and “Sexual Behavior in the Human Female” (1951) launched the sexual revolution. This was true €“ triggering worldwide sexual promiscuity.
Until Kinsey’s books came out, nobody even suspected that promiscuity was possible, so any slutty behavior since then must be his fault.
But, so many lies. How may we count the ways? Here are a few. See my book, “Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences,” for full documentation.
Yeah, we knew there’d be a plug for a book in here somewhere. After all, this is WorldNetDaily we’re talking about.
*The film implies that Kinsey was a flawed genius “scientist” who just “worshiped data.” No. A “the ends justifies the means” Machiavellian, Kinsey cooked up phony data in his lab. Statistics in hand, he goose-stepped behind Nazi propaganda master Joseph Goebbels with lies so big few could challenge them.
Kinsey: bi-homosexual, pedophiliac, slanderer of Rosie the Riveter, Nazi. Will the crimes never end?
*The film implies that Kinsey had a population sample. No. Kinsey manufactured a “10 to 37 percent” homosexual male population in order to normalize homosexuality. He manufactured a female promiscuity myth that led to “no fault divorce,” resulting in collapsed marriages and largely victimized women and children.
See, in reality almost nobody is gay, and women are always chaste (because they are better people than men, and because they hate sex). Common sense just tells you that. Therefore, Kinsey must have fabricated his evidence. And if it wasn’t for his lies about women being capable of committing adultery just like men, we wouldn’t have “no fault divorce,” and women in loveless marriages would be protected from being able to obtain divorces.
*The film lied that Kinsey was hounded to an untimely death by dumb, religious Americans. His untimely death was surely exacerbated by his traumatized immune system compromised by an often fatal venereal disease called “Orchitis.”
Okay, I may not know that much about Kinsey, but I do know how to look things up on the internets. And, per the National Institute of Health, the “often fatal venereal disease” called orchitis is actually “an acute inflammatory reaction of the testis secondary to infection.” Most cases are contracted as a result of the mumps (”approximately 30% of patients who have mumps will develop orchitis during the course of the illness”). Yeah, orchitis is usually a side effect of mumps, that common childhood venereal disease.
Some men do get it as a manifestation of a sexually transmitted disease, but it would be the gonorrhea or chlamydia that would be considered the venereal disease, not the orchitis (which isn’t a disease). And it’s very rarely fatal.
So, we can see now why you shouldn’t accept medical diagnoses from doctors of communications.
*The film lied that until Kinsey, Americans were “hypocrites” who went to church on Sunday, were afraid of sex, were commonly unfaithful, had sex before marriage and regularly aborted.
The film said that until Kinsey, Americans went to church on Sunday? May its soul rot in hell for this lie!
And oh, it’s also untrue that before 1948 nobody ever cheated on their spouse, engaged in premarital sex, or had an abortion. And they weren’t afraid of sex either! They just had it the right way (missionary position, marital only, and only to conceive children). And they liked it that way!
*The film lied that Mrs. Kinsey was a spunky sexual savant. She did what Kinsey wanted just as Laura Linney did what Condon wanted. […] Likewise, Condon has Linney laugh gaily, just oh-so happy to be sodomized €“ a painful, debauched and disembodied homosexual act that leads to incontinence, AIDS, etc.
Um, if the act is being done by heterosexuals, is it still considered homosexual? And I thought that AIDS was caused by a virus, not a particular sexual act — but I don’t have a Ph.D. in communications, so my medical info may be out of date.
*The film lied that World War II Americans were sexually ignorant. In 1948, as Kinsey’s “Male” volume hit the nation, a campaign to control the nation’s two sexually transmitted diseases was launched to inform the public that chastity and fidelity would ensure sexual health. It did.
Not too long ago I saw a training film that was part of the W.W.II campaign to control those two diseases. It said that voluntary blood tests would ensure sexual health. (It was part of this collection of industrial shorts , and it was pretty funny.)
Annually, we record 70,000 new cases of syphilis; 650,00 gonorrhea; 64,000 AIDS; 3 million Chlamydia; 5 million trichomoniasis; 1 million genital herpes; 5.5 million human papillomavirus, plus roughly 20 other STDs. Gone are the pre-Kinsey days of “only” syphilis and gonorrhea. Millions needlessly die due to Kinsey’s sexual frauds glamorized in the Condon film.
Yes, Kinsey invented these new STDs, and so killed all those people who died of herpes and genital warts.
Condon €“ like Kinsey €“ lied. Who is insane enough to say Kinsey was a sex scientist when his claims wrought such human destruction?
Speaking of insane . . .
Dr. Judith Reisman is president of the Institute for Media Education and is the author of “Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.”
If you want to more about her, you can visit her site. There, one of the first things you will see is an endorsement from “Dr. Laura” Schlessinger. And that’s probably all the additional info about her you need to know.
February 11th, 2005 at 9:44 am
Witch-Doctor Reisman has been polluting the public discourse for decades with her paranoid rants about anything bearing on sexuality. And this is the stuff that makes it into print. Imagine how crazy the material must be that editors refuse to publish.
February 11th, 2005 at 9:45 am
WINGNUT DAILY: “Women were running the nation€™s industries. Nearly every able-bodied father, husband and son €“ except Kinsey and his sexually willing boy toy team €“ was overseas fighting for our liberty.”
S.Z.: “Then who was having the sex that Kinsey was investigating?”
Well, that’s obvious- crippled homosexuals. Duh!
February 11th, 2005 at 9:53 am
Or America was rampant with lesbianism, while the boys were off getting on the European babes or um, who knows?
February 11th, 2005 at 10:10 am
Dr. Riesman is so completely bonkers that it’s almost not worth savaging her like this.
The essential problem is, there are basically two high profile public resources when it comes to getting information of Alfred Kinsey: The aforementioned Dr. Reisman (completely nuts) and… the Kinsey Institute (Somehow, I suspect they may be a little bit biased).
There are almost no discussions of Kinsey as a scientist (On the internet, at least); They all focus on him as the instigator of the sexual revolution, and then go on to argue whether the revolution was the beginning of the golden age of aquarius, or the start of new Babylon.
And, of course, nobody feels the need to actually, you know, quote Kinsey or cite his work. It’s frustrating as hell.
February 11th, 2005 at 10:10 am
Whoa. Does anyone really believe that nobody had extramarital, homosexual, doggy-style, oral or anal sex before this guy came along and, Moseslike, brought it down from the mountain to destroy all mankind?
Anyone?
As a Doctor of Communication should know, it’s not that nobody did these things, it’s that nobody COMMUNICATED about it. Sex ain’t new, lady, and neither is the idea of women enjoying it (read: the Lex Julia, pre-Christian Rome).
February 11th, 2005 at 11:24 am
So homosexuals could be counted on one hand back in 1948? Oh, and it’s the fault of all those enlightened, albeit newly-slutty females that lead to no-fault divorces? Damn those Jezebels they should have just kept their legs closed, stayed in their marriages and let their husbands do all the buggering.
February 11th, 2005 at 11:36 am
Sex ain€™t new, lady, and neither is the idea of women enjoying it (read: the Lex Julia, pre-Christian Rome).
Wow. Now I feel like part of a long and honorable tradition.
February 11th, 2005 at 11:51 am
Just did a little textbook survey and came up with 5 additional STDs: chancroid, hepatitis B, public lice, trichomonas and ureaplasma. Dr. Riesman must have pulled the other 15 STDs out of her ass, so to speak.
February 11th, 2005 at 12:00 pm
God, what an utter hack Reisman is. Nice job trashing her. But it really is horrible how Kinsey put a gun to the heads of billions of hitherto chaste people and turned them into sex maniacs. I’m sure that without Kinsey we wouldn’t have sluts like Justice Scalia saying “I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged.”
February 11th, 2005 at 12:29 pm
Which Lex Julia was that?
February 11th, 2005 at 1:03 pm
i;m an alumnus of indiana univ, and i am proud that my alma mater didn’t fire him.
gloriana frangipana/ever more be true/she’s the pride of indiana/hail to old i.u.
put that in your pipes and smoke it with your corn silk, purdue grads!
February 11th, 2005 at 1:04 pm
SZ–where do you get the time to lampoon these kinds of idiots here and expose boot-licking pseudonymic* porn stars on your site? You are truly a renasance woman! These kind of Run For Your Life and He’s The Devil scare tactics are laughable–and yet they work. Ay-ay-ay! Thanks for making us aware of one more delusional wingnut. I think another angel just lost its wings. *yes, I made that up
February 11th, 2005 at 1:07 pm
Holy crap, SZ. Every time I think I’ve heard the most ridiculous thing, you dredge up another delusional wingnut. I think another angel just lost its wings.
February 11th, 2005 at 1:12 pm
.
February 11th, 2005 at 4:47 pm
Which Lex Julia was that?
I’m thinking of the laws that made adultery a criminal offense, named for Julia, the Caesar’s daughter, who was notoriously promiscuious (but also smart as a whip and damn funny).
February 11th, 2005 at 7:23 pm
Reisman was part of Sen. Sam Brownback’s (R-Kansas) analysis of internet porn. This was the origen of “Erototoxins” and how they are more addictive than heroin or crack cocaine.
She “suggested that more study of “erototoxins” could show how pornography is not speech-protected under the First Amendment.”
Also, didn’t the pill come out some time around then? If I recall, that actually had a bit of an effect on std rates. Perhaps if I had a Ph.D in communications, I would understand how it did not.
February 11th, 2005 at 9:23 pm
Isn’t this the same Judith Reisman who is married to George Reisman, a couple of orthodox Randites who got kicked out of church for… god knows what. If so, I would be surprised of her tack on, for example, rape, as that is pretty much a standard Objectivist esthetic ideal.
I could be switching the ei from ie, but I find it hard to believe that there could be more than two (I have to be kind of careful here, as I had dealt with the economist George back in my studying economics days, and he always seemed a nice guy, even if he believed in the literal truth of Say’s law) looney Reisman psycologists out there.
Nothing that can fuck you up more than an Objectivist psychologist…
February 12th, 2005 at 10:55 am
My father was a Navy officer from 1942-1945 (he flew from aircraft carriers, hunting submarines at night). One time he told me how he and other pilot trainees would regularly sneak off-base to be with women they knew, including some sexual encounters. If caught, they would have been court-martialed. I asked him why he would take a chance like that, and he said that hormones were strong and a natural thing in males, and he just had to go along with them.
He was not worried about the apparent contradiction between his religion and his natural urges. Further, he had a certain sense of fatalism, being in a war, when his life might be over in weeks, and even aircraft training exercises could be dangerous. So I have to give him his due.
My mother was a telephone operator during the war (a very important job) and was temporarily assigned to work in Washington DC during Christmas 1944. She told me that her roommate in Washington was a sex fiend, and she listened to many, many different stories about the sexual encounters this other women had. It appears that sex was fun for women, then, too.
She also says that illegitimate children were just as common then as now, only the stigma associated with it has changed.
I think Dr. Reisman is totally ignorant of history and the fundamental need of men and women to engage in reproductive activities.
February 12th, 2005 at 6:46 pm
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don’t mind me, I’ll just be outside, tuning-up the Uterine Repo Tow-Truck. You WILL be so kind as to find me a home address for this PSYCHOTIC WHORE OF DISINFORMATION, INGNORANCE AND IDIOCY, yes?
February 12th, 2005 at 6:54 pm
“DISINFORMATION, IGNORANCE
This is what happens when I get so freaked-out that I type too fast.
People like this psychotically-repressed bitch should be shot for the public good, before they make even MORE people as purposefully ignorant as they are.
(Oh, and props to TAS, for invoking the spirit {and voice} of Sam Kinison in their copyright notice.)
February 12th, 2005 at 7:39 pm
How weird. Back in the day, Dr. Reisman was a feminist activist (under another name), anti-porn for sure, but not anti-sex right wing nutcase (and you can both question porn and still be pro-sex and sex education). I hadn’t realized she’d gotten quite so right wing.
I am curious why Dr. Laura would support her so strongly, given that Dr. Laura has told wives to support their husbands’ use of porn. That completely contradicts everything Dr. Reisman stands for.
February 12th, 2005 at 8:09 pm
My mother was a graduate of the Notre Dame Catholic Girls School in 1954. She once remarked that half the girls in her class got married after graduation so they could find out what sex was like, as that was the only acceptable way for CGs in the 1950’s engage in such acts.
I bet Judith misses the days when non-virgins were known as ‘pigs’.
February 12th, 2005 at 11:36 pm
The righteous doc claims:
Until Kinsey “enlightened” us, Americans called sex “the marital act” and thought you should see the person you did “it” with (that is, eye-to-eye, lip-to-lip, breast-to-chest, and all the rest).
This is the first report I’ve seen that before Kinsey, sex was performed with the lights on. However, the great researcher’s other revelations were not immediately combined with “the pill” as someone speculated. While Kinsey may have launched the long-awaited downfall of decency, oral contraception was not invented until 1951, and it was not until 1960 that it first became commercially available (in the form of Enovid).