Her right to public dysentery is a constitutional
Michelle Malkin may grow up someday and stop being such a silly ninny girl. After the NY Times broke the story, she found it insufficient to berate their real journalists. She also berated the LA Times for covering the story afterward.
I guess it never occurred to her that her reportage did the same ‘damage’ as the actions of the LA Times.
Now all their careful efforts have been destroyed by Bush-deranged reporters who fashion themselves the true protectors of America. Here’s editor Bill Keller explaning why he ignored the Bush administration’s argument for keeping the legal program secret:
Bill Keller, the newspaper’s executive editor, said: “We have listened closely to the administration’s arguments for withholding this information, and given them the most serious and respectful consideration. We remain convinced that the administration’s extraordinary access to this vast repository of international financial data, however carefully targeted use of it may be, is a matter of public interest.”
“Public interest,” my you-know-what.
Actually, I’m not sure I know what her ‘you-know-what’ is. But I’m pretty sure she has a bug up it. One planted by Alberto Gonzalez. But she’ll never tell us about that, because she likes it there. It makes her feel all safe and cozy and special.
The public has a clear interest in knowing what law its illegal government is breaking now. But I’m sure there’s no public interest in her you-know-what, beyond the idle curiousity of wondering how it got attached to her neck.
June 23rd, 2006 at 10:13 am
So which law is it breaking?
June 24th, 2006 at 9:47 am
Hello?