"Remember, as far as anyone knows, we're a nice normal family." - Homer Simpson

Street Signs





Street Traffic


Campaign Analysts

Media Sources

Multimedia Powers

Progressive Sources

Debate Forums

Blog Compilers

Search Tools



Street Regulars

Regarding Members
Of Our Team Effort


Current members are listed above. But many contributed before, some now blogging giants and some who blog no more.

Asterisks* throughout the sidebars denote the full roster of our talented team, past and present.

In the category below are those whose blogs are defunct, or blog extremely rarely, or who never had their own blog at all.

But it is a partial list, as all other past members are categorized by region, topic or both, elsewhere in these sidebars.

Previous Members

Community Blogs

NY-DC Power Corridor

Northeast Patriots

Middle Movers

Western Pioneers

Southern Progress

Election Specialists

Mass Media News And Critique

Technical & Design For Our Website

Geo Visitors Map

Side Streets




Donate via PayPal
Your support keeps us
going and we thank you
for your generosity.

******************

A Liberal Network


The Economy

Today's Bush Tax


Energy Sense

The Middle East

Global Outlook

Foe Fighters

Wits & Giggles

Legal Experts

Human Equality

Cultural Literacy

Left, Actually

Science & Health

Environmentalists

Educating Well

Belief & Philosophy




September 15, 2007

Protecting the Poor Little General

The MoveOn ad was stupid because it created a distraction from the central point that the War on Iraq must end ASAP. However, the politicians jumping through the opening MoveOn provided are not above criticism either. Taking a quick swipe at the topic is understandable. But making MoveOn into some anti-American monster is proof positive that Silly Season’s upon us.

John McCain provides the perfect example. Throw a legal organization out of the country for doing something legal? Sure, if we end free speech. It can’t be more obvious that the real unAmerican action would be to do as the Senator suggests.

Beyond the obvious anti-American sentiment of the Senator, however, let’s review it logically. What, exactly, is McCain suggesting? He claims that career military officers should never be personally attacked. Since when has that been a standard?

Ulysses Grant was attacked personally repeatedly. Other generals have been throughout our country’s history. Truman fired MacArthur for his gung ho expressions. What makes Petraeus more important to keep him above reproach?

Or is McCain saying Petraeus got his feelings hurt and he needs political protection so he won’t break down and cry?

Other generals spoke their mind about Iraq and were forced to retire by the Bush White House because they refused to endorse the president’s policies. Petraeus, who’s told friends he wants to run for president in 2012, is the exception, willing to stick his neck out to back anything Bush wants. I should think he can shed criticism like a duck sheds water,

Those same generals and politicians: have they spoken of the bloody murders of hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis because of Bush’s invisible Saddam nukes? Where’s the outrage on that? Guys like McCain should STFU with their fake posturing about the poor little Genaral who plans to run for president in 2012.

2 Responses to “Protecting the Poor Little General”

  1. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator Says:

    War Of Anti-War, Pro-War Protesters…

    Thousands of anti-war protesters, including a sizeable contingent of military veterans, rallied outs…

  2. Ymarsakar Says:

    For your convenience, Hayden.

    Neo-Neocon