What the (nearly) final polls show: Obama, almost 100%
What was the (largely discredited) Bradley effect? 3%.
During the primaries, a number of pollsters overestimated Obama’s percentage by what? Usually 3 points.
So we can determine from both that any state where Obama’s now 4 points ahead, he’ll likely win. Doing that, he easily wins. So let’s set a higher hurdle for him.
Let’s just go with the most accurate pollsters. And let’s move the margin to 6%.
Compared to Kerry, Obama would pick up NM, IA and OH and he’d lose MN. Which would give him 274 Electoral Votes and the presidency.
So that’s the margin McCain would have to make up in one day, in Ohio: 6%, while winning every state closer. (The margins in NM and IA are even wider, so they’re untouchable.)
That’s a pretty narrow window for a McCain upset.
If McCain won everything 4% or closer, Obama would also pick up CO for a 283 EV win.
And what if we gave McCain every state where he’s behind by 3% or less today? Obama would win VA (13), and NV (5) for a 301 EV win.
And the national polls look even darker for McCain today than they did yesterday. Rasmussen says 52% - 46%. Gallup says 55% - 44%. Ipsos-McClatchy 50% - 42%. Zogby 50.9% - 43.8%. Marist 53% - 44%. Hotline 50% - 45%. GWU 50% - 44%. And even Fox News says 50% - 43%. ALL OF THEM show Obama’s lead widening as the undecideds start rolling in.
Demographically, Obama’s winning ALL education levels, ALL regions (yes, even the South by 47%-46%) and most other demographic distinctions. There’s only 3 that McCain’s going to win: voters over 65 (pre-boomers), Republicans and white males. Almost: Independents have now switched back to give McCain a 32% - 24% lead, the only trend anywhere in the final week that can give McCain any encouragement. And most of that change was caused by Indies moving back to undecided, as McCain only picked up 2% of them.
The only usually reliable pollster picking up McCain-friendly trends beyond that small shift in Independents is SurveyUSA, which shows a lot of tightening in VA, OH and MN. But McCain would have to win VA plus OH plus every other contested state (except PA and NH, which even SUSA gives to Obama, and most analysts consider SUSA’s MN result to be an outlier, far from any other poll).
So again, McCain’s upset window is very narrow.
So yeah, we’d all better keep up the GOTV effort, especially Democrats in FL, OH, VA, MN, CO, IN, NV, GA, AZ, and perhaps ND and MT. Let’s shut that window completely.
By 7:30 pm Eastern tomorrow night, polls will be closed in the contested states of IN, OH, VA, NC, GA and FL. And by 8 pm Eastern, NH, PA and MO will be closed. Watching just those to be certain that Obama wins NH and PA, all he needs from the other seven is just one. So the odds are high that by 8:30-9:00 Eastern, we’ll know the national outcome. (All the poll closing data was compiled beautifully by DavidNYC at Swing State Project, including pointers to key Senate and House races, as well.)
Extra-special links about McCain’s secret plan to upset:



November 3rd, 2008 at 2:41 pm
The real issue is not how well Obama or McCain might do state-by-state, but that we shouldn’t have battleground states and spectator states in the first place. Every vote in every state should be politically relevant in a presidential election. And, every vote should be equal. We should have a national popular vote for President in which the White House goes to the candidate who gets the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral vote — that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
Because of state-by-state enacted rules for winner-take-all awarding of their electoral votes, recent candidates with limited funds have concentrated their attention on a handful of closely divided “battleground” states. In 2004 two-thirds of the visits and money were focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money went to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people have been merely spectators to the presidential election.
Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide.
The National Popular Vote bill has passed 21 state legislative chambers, including one house in Arkansas, Colorado, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, and both houses in California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These four states possess 50 electoral votes– 19% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.
See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com